still are part of a culture predisposed to virtuality, a culture where in every realm of endeavor, from industry to politics to art, the word trumps the deed and the immaterial emotion trumps the material fact.

How, though, is single-payer any less beholden to the "needs of the 'system'"?

defined by the passivity of a people that has sacrificed its own, dem ocratic power of large numbers on the altar of strange and unstated beliefs.
His anger—and his emphasis on “a man” as the relevant object of social consideration—were unusual.
As we get better at understanding why people get sick, we will also get better at deciding whether or not to insure them. Ultimately, the entire nation could be reduced to two perfect circles: the people who pay for insurance and don’t need it, and the people who need insurance but can’t pay for it. “I mean, asymptotically,” I said, “you will slowly approach perfect knowledge . . .”
The argument for single payer is straightforward.
The demand for not dying, to give just one example, is pretty much unlimited.
Overtreatment, of course, is another word for growth, and it is the natural consequence of a market-driven system.
- Annotation on Sick in the head: Why America won't get the health-care system it needs—By Luke Mitchell (Harper's Magazine)

Share this annotation

Post to Basecamp Project Update Twitter Bookmark on Del.icio.us Send E-mail Post to a Blog Post to Backpack Post to Trac Post to Bugzilla Post to a Tumblr Update Friendfeed Posterous

paste in your blog
 
paste anywhere: IM, mail
 
give this link to a friend
 

Tags: jul_09, harpers.org, annotations
Comments are allowed
This copy is published

Note: "This copy is kept-secret" would mean its URL is not published, but anyone knowing its URL can still view it.